Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Finfrock v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01264
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Finfrock
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr , Neil Turner and Becky Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finfrock v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00480
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Finfrock
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Neil Turner and Becky Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Finfrock v. Secretary, DFACS
as 10-15299
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH W. FINFROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Finfrock v. Wise et al
as 2:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Finfrock
Defendant:
William P. Wise and P. Yacina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finfrock v. Wise et al
as 2:2010cv00231
Petitioner:
Joseph W. Finfrock
Respondent:
William P. Wise and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Finfrock v. Crist et al
as 2:2010cv00150
Petitioner:
Joseph W. Finfrock
Respondent:
Charlie Crist, George H. Sheldon, Timothy Budz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FINFROCK et al v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2009cv01239
Petitioner:
JOSEPH W. FINFROCK and NATHAN EDGAR PATTON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finfrock v. State Of Florida et al
as 2:2009cv00629
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Finfrock
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Desoto County, Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finfrock v. State Of Florida et al
as 2:2009cv00628
Petitioner:
Joseph W. Finfrock
Respondent:
State Of Florida, Timothy Budz, Geo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finfrock v. State Of Florida et al
as 2:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Finfrock
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Geo, Timothy Budz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
