Loya v. Target Corporation
| Mario Loya |
| Target Corporation |
| 3:2018cv02527 |
| November 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James G Carr |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Target Corporation. (Tobin, Elizabeth) |
| Notice by Clerk that Target Corporation failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (D,TM) |
| Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint filed by Target Corporation. (Tobin, Elizabeth) |
Order [non-document]granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney Elizabeth E. Tobin for Target Corporation. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. The CM/ECF registration form can be found at www.ohnd.uscourts.gov under Forms. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #6 ). Judge James G. Carr on 12/12/18.(C,D)
|
|
Order [non-document] granting Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Related Doc #2 ). Judge James G. Carr on 12/12/18.(C,D)
|
| Filing 6 Motion for attorney Elizabeth E. Tobin to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-9030650, filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Elizabeth E. Tobin)(Toth, K.) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Stipulation for Extension of Time until 12/18/2018 to move, plead or otherwise respond to the Complaint filed by Target Corporation. (Toth, K.) |
| Filing 4 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons filed by Mario Loya. (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 3 Supplement to Complaint - Redacted Exhibit A - Copy OF EEOC Charge filed by Mario Loya. Related document(s) #1 . (Landry, Francis) Modified text on 11/1/2018 (S,JM). |
| Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO239) filed by Plaintiff Mario Loya. (Landry, Francis) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Target Corporation.. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Mario Loya. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copy of EEOC Charge, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landry, Francis) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (S,JM) |
| Judge James G. Carr assigned to case. (S,JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Loya v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth E. Tobin |
| Represented By: | K. Ellen Toth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mario Loya | |
| Represented By: | Francis J. Landry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
