Bishawi v. NEOCC et al
| Ahmad Bishawi |
| NEOCC, CCA Corrections Corporation of America, Roddie Rushing, Michael Pugh, Dennis Johnson, Mr. Gozman, David Yemma, E. Villa-Williams, V. Aikens, Mr. Grigsby, H. Hollic, M. Mackey, S. Kelty, W. Powel, K. Campfer and Sean Daugherty |
| 4:2012cv03106 |
| December 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Mahoning |
| Sara Lioi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
Memorandum Opinion: The Court overrules plaintiff's objections, accepts the R&R, and grants defendant's motion for summary judgment. The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. This case is dismissed. (Related Doc. Nos. 46 , 49 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 3/17/2017. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
13
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 11 ) is denied. His motion to expedite the Court's ruling (Doc. No. 12 ) is denied as moot. Judge Sara Lioi on 2/5/2014. (P,J)
|
|
Filing
9
Memorandum Opinion and Order: This action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/26/2013. (P,J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
