Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Geer v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Geer
Defendant:
United States, DEA Task Force, ATF Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. Core Civic of America et al.
as 4:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Trent A. Carey
Defendant:
Core Civic of America, NEOCC, Sgt. Burker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma DOC et al
as 4:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Noel King, Sonny Moore, Reginald Anderson and others
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma DOC, Derrick Yazel, Jason Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Kaetz v. USA, et al
as 22-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN NEOCC
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01614
Petitioner:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN OF NEOCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Secretary, Department of the Army et al
as 2:2020cv06288
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Senate, Warden, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bayon v. North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC) et al
as 4:2020cv00551
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC), US Marshals, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayon v. North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC) et al
as 6:2020cv06073
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
North East Ohio Core Civic (NEOCC), US Marshals, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Warden of N.E.O.C.C.
as 3:2019cv00321
Petitioner:
Ronald G. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden of NEOCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Warden of N.E.O.C.C.
as 4:2019cv02331
Petitioner:
Ronald G. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden of NEOCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
