Harris v. FBOP et al
| Keelan Harris |
| FBOP, Harrell Watts, Ian Connors, J.L. Norwood, Michael Carvajal, Ralph Hanson, Steven Merlak, Bill Story, Steven Grimm, Glen Johnson, Marilou Burns, Lt. Brinker, K. Pingatore, B. Butts, Mathew Butler and Joel Cohn |
| 4:2018cv00156 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Youngstown Office |
| Columbiana |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF Nos. 12 , 32 , 37 ) are granted. A separate dismissal Order shall issue. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/22/2019. (JLG)
|
|
Filing
4
Memorandum Opinion and Order Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is hereby dismissed as against the FBOP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this dismissal could not be taken in good faith. This action may proceed as against the remaining individual Defendants. The Clerk's Office is directed to forward the appropriate documents to the U.S. Marshals for service of process on the remaining Defendants, and a copy of this order shall be included with the documents to be served. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 6/7/2018. (S,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
