Morgan v. FBOP et al
Gemar Morgan |
FBOP, Fernando Garza, J.C. Petrucci and Ian Connors |
4:2023cv00539 |
March 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Sara Lioi |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Notice to the Court that the Court did not include page 2 into the docket entry for case# 4:23 CV 00539 filed by Gemar Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Page 2 of Original Petition, #2 Filed Petition of Habeas Corpus, #3 Envelope)Related document(s) #1 .(G,M) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/10/2023: #4 Corrected Filed Petition for Habeas Corpus) (G,M). |
Filing 2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Gemar Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Financial Application, #2 Envelope)(G,M) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Pursuant with 28 USC 1361 against Ian Connors, FBOP, Fernando Garza, J.C. Petrucci. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Gemar Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Definitions/Codes re Administrative Remedy, #2 Documents re Administrative Remedy, #3 Proposed Summons and USM 285 Form to Warden Garza, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Envelope) (G,M) |
Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (G,M) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson. (G,M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.