Hosseinipour v. Cook et al.
| Ahmad Hosseinipour |
| Dallas Cook, Natasha Cook and Coitsville Police Department, Ohio 44436 |
| 4:2023cv02307 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Ahmad Hosseinipour. (G,M)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplement to #1 Complaint, filed by Ahmad Hosseinipour. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Driver's License of Dallas Cook, #2 Redacted Driver's License of Dallas Cook)(G,M)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Hosseinipour. Related document(s) #1 . (G,M)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint with jury demand against Coitsville Police Department, Ohio 44436, Dallas Cook, Natasha Cook. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Ahmad Hosseinipour. (Attachments: #1 Coitsville Township Police Report, #2 Coitsville Police Department, Stolen Property Addendum, #3 Order of Decision of Magistrate, Youngstown Municipal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet). (G,M)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr.. (G,M)
|
|
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr assigned to case. (G,M)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
