Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ahmad Hosseinipour v. Dallas Cook, et al
as 24-3334
Plaintiff:
AHMAD HOSSEINIPOUR
Defendant:
DALLAS COOK, NATASHA COOK and COITSVILLE, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Hosseinipour v. Cook et al.
as 4:2023cv02307
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hosseinipour
Defendant:
Dallas Cook, Natasha Cook and Coitsville Police Department, Ohio 44436
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lavada Kollar, et al v. Rudolph Krafft, et al
as 21-4151
Plaintiff:
LAVADA ELAINE KOLLAR
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD HOSSEINIPOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
RUDOLPH KRAFFT, MD and MERCY HEALTH
Kollar et al v. Krafft et al.
as 4:2021cv01184
Plaintiff:
Lavada Elaine Kollar and Ahmad Hosseinipour
Defendant:
Mercy Health and Rudolph Krafft, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmad Hosseinipour v. Ohio Attorney General, Section
as 11-3301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMAD HOSSEINIPOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, SECTION OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Hosseinipour v. Ohio Attorney General, Section of Health and Human Services
as 4:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hosseinipour
Defendant:
Ohio Attorney General, Section of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmad Hosseinipour v. James Evans, et al
as 11-3031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMAD HOSSEINIPOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES EVANS, Judge, Mahoning County Court, RAYMOND J. MASEK, Attorney, JOHN DIXON, Attorney and others
Hosseinipour v. Evans et al
as 4:2010cv02246
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hosseinipour
Defendant:
James Evans, Raymond J. Masek, John Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hosseinipour v. Grodner et al
as 1:2010cv00311
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hosseinipour
Defendant:
Teena Grodner and Keyaunoosh Kassaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hosseinipour v. Forum Health, et al.
as 4:2009cv02008
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hosseinipour
Defendant:
Forum Health, James C Evans, Martin S. Hume and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
