Moore v. Mitchell
Lee E Moore |
Betty Mitchell |
1:2000cv00023 |
January 18, 2000 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Susan J. Dlott |
Michael R Merz |
Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 195 ORDER ADOPTING 190 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations in their entirety. Petitioner's Amended Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. However, the Co urt finds reasonable jurists could disagree with this Court's application of Martinez v. Ryan and Trevino v. Thaler and with this Court's application of the law of the case doctrine in resolving that issue and GRANTS Petitioner a certificate of appealability.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/9/2015. (jlw1) |
Filing 190 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - Having reconsidered the matter in light of the Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Motion for Relief from Judgment be denied but that Moo re be granted a certificate of appealability as to the denial because of the novelty of the issues regarding application of Martinez and Trevino to Ohio. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/7/2015. (kpf1) |
Filing 183 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that Moore's Motion for Relief from Judgment be DENIED. However, reasonable jurists could disagree with this conclusion and recommends that Moore be granted a certificate of appealability on the Motion. Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/28/2014. (kpf1) |
Filing 169 ORDER TO FILE DIGITIZED RECORD AND RE-FILE PENDING MOTION - It is hereby ORDERED that, not later than February 25, 2014, Petitioner refile the Motion to For Relief From a Judgment or Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (Doc. No. 168) with PageID record references. The time of the Warden to respond to that Motion under S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.2 will run from the date of filing of the amended motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/22/2014. (kpf1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moore v. Mitchell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Lee E Moore | |
Represented By: | Laurence E Komp |
Represented By: | Michael Jay O'Hara |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Betty Mitchell | |
Represented By: | Matthew C Hellman |
Represented By: | Charles L Wille |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.