Duct Utilities Inc, et al v. Star Communication, et al
| Duct Utilities & Technologies Inc and Fast Point Acquisition Corp |
| Star Communication Services and David L Keever |
| Star Communication Services and David L Keever |
| Duct Utilities & Technologies Inc and Fast Point Acquisition Corp |
| Star Communication Services and David L Keever |
| Randall - Drew and Christopher Kessen |
| Sharieff Powell |
| 1:2002cv00174 |
| March 12, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Sandra S Beckwith |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 43 Motion to Enforce Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation 46 ; The judgment is revived. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 4/14/14. (mb)
|
|
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that movant Powell's 43 MOTION to Revive Judgment be Granted and that the Court Revive the judgment issued in favor of the defendants against plaintiffs for $13,778,594.17, together with attorney's fees an d interest from 3/10/2004, the date of the original judgment, to 3/10/2009, the date the judgment became dormant, and from the date of revival, 3/7/2014, until the judgment is satisfied. Objections to R&R due by 3/31/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/14/2014. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
