Strong, et al v. U-Haul Co of Mass In, et al
| Christian S Strong and Brian Hunzicker |
| U-Haul Co of Massachusetts Inc, U-Haul International Inc, Amerco Inc, ABC Corporation, BCD Corporation and CDE Corporation |
| Mindy M Swegles |
| Amerco Inc, ABC Corporation, BCD Corporation and CDE Corporation |
| Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP |
| 1:2003cv00383 |
| May 23, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
571
ORDER granting 566 Joint Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/2/2010. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
561
ORDER - The Court's previous Order (Doc. 317 ), to the extent it required that no documents be filed unless ordered by the Court or unless leave has been requested and granted, is hereby VACATED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/22/2010. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
558
DECISION AND ENTRY IMPOSING SANCTIONS AGAINST ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, U-HAUL CO. OF MASSACHUSETTS AND OHIO, INC. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/1/2010. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
533
OPINION and ORDER - The Court OVERRULES the parties' objections to Magistrate Judge Hogan's Report and Recommendation; the Court adopts the October 18, 2007 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/31/09. (jk1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
