Shirk v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al
| 1:2005cv00049 |
| January 26, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
398
JUDGMENT in favor of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Fifth Third Bancorp, Fifth Third Bank, Fifth Third Investment Advisors, Fifth Third Pension and Profit Sharing Committee, Allen M Hill, Darryl F Allen, David J Wagner, Donald B Ha ckleford, Dudley S Taft, George A Schaefer, Jr, Greg D Carmichael, Hendrik G Meijer, James E Rogers, James F Girton, James P Hackett, Joan R Herschede, John Barrett, John Does 1-30, John Schiff, Jr, John B Reardon, Joseph H Head, Jr, Joyce Tillman, K evin Kabat, Michael D Baker, Michael K Keating, Mitchell D Livingston, Neal E Arnold, Paul L Reynolds, Pete Pesce, Richard Farmer, Robert Morgan, Robert Sullivan, Robert L Koch, II, Robert P Niehaus, Stephen J Schrantz, Thomas B Donell, Thomas W Traylor and against Benjamin Shirk, Ronald Jauss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/30/09. (jl1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shirk v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
