Shirk v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv00049
Filed: January 26, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 398 JUDGMENT in favor of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Fifth Third Bancorp, Fifth Third Bank, Fifth Third Investment Advisors, Fifth Third Pension and Profit Sharing Committee, Allen M Hill, Darryl F Allen, David J Wagner, Donald B Ha ckleford, Dudley S Taft, George A Schaefer, Jr, Greg D Carmichael, Hendrik G Meijer, James E Rogers, James F Girton, James P Hackett, Joan R Herschede, John Barrett, John Does 1-30, John Schiff, Jr, John B Reardon, Joseph H Head, Jr, Joyce Tillman, K evin Kabat, Michael D Baker, Michael K Keating, Mitchell D Livingston, Neal E Arnold, Paul L Reynolds, Pete Pesce, Richard Farmer, Robert Morgan, Robert Sullivan, Robert L Koch, II, Robert P Niehaus, Stephen J Schrantz, Thomas B Donell, Thomas W Traylor and against Benjamin Shirk, Ronald Jauss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/30/09. (jl1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shirk v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?