Kelley et al v. UNICO Holdings, Inc. et al
Pamela K Kelley and Jack Kelley |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and UNICO Holdings, Inc. |
1:2007cv00008 |
January 4, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
BUTLER |
Herman J. Weber |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ORDER adopting as modified the Report and Recommendations 33 ; granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 21 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. This case is Dismissed and Terminated on the docket of this Court at plaintiffs' cost. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 3/29/10. (do1) |
Filing 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 28 MOTION to Strike Exhibits A, C, D & E attached to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by UNICO Holdings, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 21 MOTION for Partia l Summary Judgment as to Applicability of Ohio Damage Caps filed by UNICO Holdings, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by UNICO Holdings, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc.: that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19) be GRANTED and this case be CLOSED; defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 21) be DENIED AS MOOT; and the motion to strike (Doc. 28) be DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/16/09. (jl1, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.