Maxey v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
| Michael Maxey |
| State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 1:2007cv00158 |
| February 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Timothy S Hogan |
| S Arthur Spiegel |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
OPINION AND ORDER denying 62 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and 64 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts One and Two. However, the Court finds that no genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to Counts Three, Four and Five and therefore GRANTS 62 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES 64 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as to those claims. Further, the court sets a Final Pretrial Conference for 4/1/2010 at 2:00 PM and a three-day Jury Trial to commence 5/11/2010 at 9:30 AM. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 2/2/2010. (km1)
|
|
Filing
116
OPINION AND ORDER denying 68 Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendants' Expert Mark Sargent; denying 75 Renewed Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendants' Expert Mark Sargent; denying 76 Motion to Strike the Affidavit of James Goodman; denying 77 Motion to Strike the Affidavit of John Heltman. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 11/3/2009. (km1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
