International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local Union No 212 et al v. American Laundry Machinery, Inc. et al
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local Union No 212 and CinElect |
American Laundry Machinery, Inc., Martin Franchises, Inc., George L Strike and Anthony Y Strike |
1:2007cv00324 |
April 23, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Timothy S Hogan |
S Arthur Spiegel |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Resource & Recovery Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 OPINION AND ORDER denying 135 Motion to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery; denying 144 Motion to Strike. The Court reminds the parties that this matter is scheduled for a final pretrial conference on 7/15/2010, a summary jury trial on 9/14/2010 at 9:3 0 AM, and a ten-day jury/bench trial set for 11/2/2010 at 9:30 AM. The parties should not anticipate a change in that schedule and the Court will not look favorably on any further delays in this case. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 1/12/2010. (km1) |
Filing 99 OPINION AND ORDER overruling 76 Defendants' Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order 75 , overruling 77 Plaintiffs' Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order 75 , overruling 84 Plaintiffs' Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order 80 . The Court AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's Order 75 80 in all respects. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 1/8/2009. (km1, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.