Franklin v. United States Postal Service et al
1:2008cv00466 |
July 9, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Labor: Fair Standards Office |
Timothy S Hogan |
Herman J. Weber |
None |
Federal Question |
15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants Lee Hornberger, Cincinnati Counseling Services, Inc., and the APWU be Dismissed from this action for lack of service purusant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Objections to R&R due by 6/15/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 5/29/2009. (art, ) |
Filing 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant NALC's 24 MOTION to Dismiss AMENDED COMPLAINT be Granted. Objections to R&R due by 4/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 4/1/2009. (art, ) |
Filing 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 28 MOTION to Dismiss filed by United States Postal Service be Granted. Objections to R&R due by 4/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 4/1/2009. (art, ) |
Filing 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant GHA's 5 and 14 MOTIONS to Dismiss be Granted. Objections to R&R due by 4/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 3/16/2009. (art, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Franklin v. United States Postal Service et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.