Rosser International, Inc. v. Jack Rouse Associates, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Rosser International, Inc. v. Jack Rouse Associates, Inc.

Rosser International, Inc. v. Jack Rouse Associates, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Rosser International, Inc.
Defendant:	Jack Rouse Associates, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2008cv00681
Filed:	October 1, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Contract: Other Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S Hogan
Presiding Judge:	Herman J. Weber
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2010	Filing 62 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 59 ; denying 26 Motion to Dismiss. Case is recommitted to the United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 3/29/10. (do1)
March 8, 2010	Filing 59 ORDER that 58 Parties motion to extend fact discovery until 4/15/2010 be Granted. Plaintiff's deadline to identify and produce primary expert reports set for 4/15/2010; Plaintiff's deadline to produce rebuttal expert reports set for 5/17 /2010; Defendant's deadline to produce rebuttal expert reports set for 5/17/2010. All other dates set forth in 57 Scheduling Order shall remain unchanged. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that counterclaim defendants Mr. William Griffin, Mr. Roland Vaughan, and Mr. Pau Kinzie's 26 MOTION to Dismiss be Denied subject to re-filing after the completion of fact discovery, or, in any event, by 6/18/2010. ( Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2010). Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 3/8/2010. (art)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2010

Filing 62 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 59 ; denying 26 Motion to Dismiss. Case is recommitted to the United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 3/29/10. (do1)

March 8, 2010

Filing 59 ORDER that 58 Parties motion to extend fact discovery until 4/15/2010 be Granted. Plaintiff's deadline to identify and produce primary expert reports set for 4/15/2010; Plaintiff's deadline to produce rebuttal expert reports set for 5/17 /2010; Defendant's deadline to produce rebuttal expert reports set for 5/17/2010. All other dates set forth in 57 Scheduling Order shall remain unchanged. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that counterclaim defendants Mr. William Griffin, Mr. Roland Vaughan, and Mr. Pau Kinzie's 26 MOTION to Dismiss be Denied subject to re-filing after the completion of fact discovery, or, in any event, by 6/18/2010. ( Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2010). Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 3/8/2010. (art)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosser International, Inc. v. Jack Rouse Associates, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosser International, Inc.
Represented By:	Jessica Ashley Dipre
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Rouse Associates, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?