Isaacs v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Isaacs v. Commissioner of Social Security

Isaacs v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Randy Lee Isaacs
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2008cv00828
Filed:	November 26, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S Hogan
Presiding Judge:	S Arthur Spiegel
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 4, 2009	Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 Report and Recommendation, except to the extent he recommends remand for further proceedings. Further, the Court REVERSES the decision of the ALJ pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and ENTERS Final Ju dgment in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that he is entitled to Social Security disability insurance benefits as of the amended date of 8/5/2004. Accordingly, the Court AWARDS Plaintiff disability insurance benefits based on that date and REMANDS the case to Defendant Commissioner for an immediate award consistent with this Opinion & Order. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 11/3/2009. (km1)
September 22, 2009	Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the decision of the Commissioner be Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC 405(g). Objections to R&R due by 10/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 9/22/2009. (art)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 4, 2009

Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 Report and Recommendation, except to the extent he recommends remand for further proceedings. Further, the Court REVERSES the decision of the ALJ pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and ENTERS Final Ju dgment in favor of the Plaintiff, finding that he is entitled to Social Security disability insurance benefits as of the amended date of 8/5/2004. Accordingly, the Court AWARDS Plaintiff disability insurance benefits based on that date and REMANDS the case to Defendant Commissioner for an immediate award consistent with this Opinion & Order. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 11/3/2009. (km1)

September 22, 2009

Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the decision of the Commissioner be Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC 405(g). Objections to R&R due by 10/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 9/22/2009. (art)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Isaacs v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Lee Isaacs
Represented By:	Amanda R Laurens
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?