Leonard v. Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary
| Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary |
| Patrick Leonard |
| 1:2009cv00056 |
| January 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Michael R Merz |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 86 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly it is hereby Ordered that this case and 1:17cv28 are dismissed without prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/22/17. (wam)
|
|
Filing
86
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 in 1:17-cv-00028-TSB-MRM, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, re 6 in 1:09-cv-00056-SJD-MRM Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Objections to R&R due by 3/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/7/17. (kma)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER DENYING HABEAS PETITION AND AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 47 and 60 Report and Recommendations and overruling objections. A Certificate of Appealability is hereby GRANTED as to Grounds One, Sixteen (subclaim B), Nineteen, Twe nty (the subclaims based on the failure to impeach the testimony of Gries and Minges, the lack of an investigation, and the testimony of Jeanne Hutcherson), Twenty-One (the subclaim on the scope of the mitigation investigation.), Twenty-Three, Twenty-Four, Twenty-Six, and Twenty-Seven.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam)
|
|
Filing
60
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Upon recommittal and reconsideration, the Magistrate Judge adheres to his prior recommendation: [b]ased on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with pr ejudice. Leonard should, however, be granted a certificate of appealability on Grounds for Relief One, Sixteen, and Twenty-Four. (Report, Doc. No. 47, PageID 1286.) Objections to R&R due by 6/16/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/28/2014. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER TO DIGITIZE THE RECORD - The electronic record shall be filed not later than June 6, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/22/2014. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
47
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Leonard should, however, be granted a certificate of appealability on Grounds for Relief One, Sixteen, and Twenty-Four. Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/6/2013. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER AFFIRMING the Amended Order (doc. 25) and the Supplemental Opinion (doc. 29). The Court OVERRULES Petitioners Objections (docs. 27, 31).. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/16/10. (wam1)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF - On July 19, 2010, the Magistrate Judge granted in part and denied in part Petitioner's Motion for Discovery ("Amended Order," Doc. No. 25). Petitioner objected to those portions of the Amended Order which denied some of the requested discovery, but neither party objected to that portion of the Amended Order which granted discovery. The last line of the Amended Order reads "All discovery granted herein shall be completed by November 30, 2010 ." No party has objected to that portion of the Order. Counsel are reminded that an objection to a magistrate judge's order on a nondispositive motion does not stay the effectiveness of that order. S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 72.3. The Court therefo re expects the discovery already granted to be completed by November 30, 2010. If Chief Judge Dlott upholds some or all of Petitioner's Objections, Petitioner will be granted additional time to complete that discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/26/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
29
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/25/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
25
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING PART PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/19/2010. (gh1)
|
|
Filing
23
BRIEFING ORDER ON DISCOVERY - Having read Respondent's Renewed Motion for Reconsideration, the Court agrees it is proper to consider Respondent's arguments on the merits of discovery. Accordingly, Petitioner shall treat the renewed Motion as if it were a memorandum in opposition to the Motion for Discovery and shall file a reply memorandum not later than June 25, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/9/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER STRIKING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/3/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - The Petition herein having been filed on July 8, 2009, the case is hereby set for scheduling conference by telephone on Friday, August 14, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Not later than Friday, August 7, 2009, the parties shall f ile a joint proposed schedule (or include in one filing their differing proposed schedule dates) for the following case events: filing of (1) the answer and return of writ, (2) the Petitioner's reply, (3) any motion by any part for discovery, (4 ) the date by which Petitioner shall moved for an evidentiary hearing if one is desired, and (5) any additional case events which the parties believe should be scheduled. During the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss any other issues expected to be contested in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/27/2009. (kopf1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Leonard v. Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Patrick Leonard | |
| Represented By: | Sharon A Hicks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
