Testerman v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Testerman v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Testerman v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Daniel Testerman
Respondent:	Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2009cv00121
Filed:	February 19, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S Hogan
Presiding Judge:	S Arthur Spiegel
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 24, 2010	Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 9 Report and Recommendation, granting 5 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The Court DENIES WITH PREJUDICE Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 . The Court FINDS that a certificate of appealability should not issue and CERTIFIES that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, therefore, denying Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 2/24/2010. (km1)
January 14, 2010	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 5 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted and that petitioner's 2 petition for writ of habeas corpus be Dismissed with prejudice on the ground that it is barred from review under the one year statute of limitations. A certificate of appealability should not issue. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith and therefore, Deny petitioner leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 2/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 1/13/2010. (art)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 24, 2010

Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 9 Report and Recommendation, granting 5 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The Court DENIES WITH PREJUDICE Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 . The Court FINDS that a certificate of appealability should not issue and CERTIFIES that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, therefore, denying Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 2/24/2010. (km1)

January 14, 2010

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 5 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted and that petitioner's 2 petition for writ of habeas corpus be Dismissed with prejudice on the ground that it is barred from review under the one year statute of limitations. A certificate of appealability should not issue. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith and therefore, Deny petitioner leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 2/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 1/13/2010. (art)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Testerman v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Testerman
Represented By:	Jennifer M Kinsley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?