Guethlein v. Postal Service (U.S.) et al
| Diana Elisabeth Guethlein |
| Postal Service (U.S.), William Price, Rick Collett, Edward Westerfield, William Miller, Ken Aukerbauer, Bill DuPrie, William Zerhausen, Sterling Hawks, Tom Lang, Joey Bramlege, Tom Comos, Joe Meiman, Vince Angelicia, Jim Ross, Phyllis McGuire and Denise Porter |
| 1:2009cv00451 |
| June 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Timothy S Hogan |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation 53 . Case is Dismissed and Terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 12/20/12. (do1)
|
|
Filing
53
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Postal Service (U.S.), 3 Complaint filed by Diana Elizabeth Guethlein: that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 46) be GRANTED and this case CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 8/13/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 7/25/12. (jl1)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 9 Motion for Partial Dismissal; adopting Report and Recommendation 23 . Case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 2/17/11. (do1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
