Kings Mazda, Inc. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
Kings Mazda, Inc. |
Mazda Motor of America, Inc. doing business as Mazda North America Operations |
1:2009cv00689 |
September 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Timothy S Hogan |
S Arthur Spiegel |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Plaintiff Kings Mazda, Inc.. (Cornett, Curtis) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/29/2010 10:00 AM in Chambers before Judge S Arthur Spiegel. Three-day Jury Trial set for 7/20/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom 842 before Judge S Arthur Spiegel on an on-deck basis. (km1) |
Filing 8 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Discovery due by 4/1/2010. Dispositive Motions not directed to pleadings due by 5/1/2010. Final Pretrial Conference tentatively set for 6/29/2010 10:00 AM. Three-day Jury Trial tentatively set for 7/20/2010 09:30 AM on an on-deck basis. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 11/5/2009. (km1) |
Filing 7 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Kings Mazda, Inc., Defendant Mazda Motor of America, Inc.. (Cornett, Curtis) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth A McNellie Defendant Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (McNellie, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing:Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/5/2009 09:30 AM in Chambers before Judge S Arthur Spiegel. (km1) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Defendant Mazda Motor of America, Inc.. (Tucker, Robert) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removalby Defendant Mazda Motor of America, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Tucker, Robert) Modified on 9/22/2009 to edit text(srj1). |
Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND filed in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas on 8/17/09, filed by Kings Mazda, Inc. against Mazda Motor of America, Inc. Case No. A0907907 (srj, ) Modified to correct filer on 9/22/2009 (jlw1). |
Pursuant to Order of General Reference filed on March 25, 1991, Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan added for purposes of discovery. (srj, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas, case number A0907907 ( Filing fee $ 350 paid - receipt number: 0648-2309547), filed by Mazda Motor of America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint) (Tucker, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kings Mazda, Inc. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kings Mazda, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Curtis L Cornett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mazda Motor of America, Inc. doing business as Mazda North America Operations | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth A McNellie |
Represented By: | Robert James Tucker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.