Khan v. Cello Partnership et al
| Faisal Khan |
| Cello Partnership and Verizon Wireless |
| 1:2010cv00118 |
| February 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER following informal 41 Discovery Conference held this date. The parties are directed to submit a joint proposed scheduling order via CM/ECF on or before 11/22/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/15/2012. (art)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER following Informal 36 Discovery Conference. With consent of the parties, the current scheduling order 34 will be Vacated. A telephonic status conference will be held on 11/8/2012 at 2:00 pm at which point a revised scheduling order will be entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/17/2012. (art)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 20 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Attorney Jonathan Britton Allison and George M Reul, Jr terminated; adopting Report and Recommendation 24 . This case is STAYED for an additional 60 days to permit plaintiff to retain new counsel. This case is recommitted to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/24/11. (do1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
