Famularcano v. SanMar Corporation et al
| Elena Famularcano |
| SanMar Corporation, Danny Bailey and Jane or/and John Doe Defendants |
| 1:2010cv00511 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| BUTLER |
| S Arthur Spiegel |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 41 Report and Recommendation in all respects, granting 35 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's federal claims. The Court further DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdicti on over Plaintiff's state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress and DISMISSES such claim without prejudice.Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 10/11/2012. (km1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/11/2012: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (km1).
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER denying plaintiff 39 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to defendants' 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Granted and this case be Ter minated on the Court's docket. The Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress and dismiss this claim without prejudice. ( Objections to R&R due by 10/5/2012). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/18/2012. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
