Farler v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Farler v. Commissioner of Social Security

Farler v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Jada Farler
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2010cv00657
Filed:	September 23, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S Hogan
Presiding Judge:	S Arthur Spiegel
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 24, 2011	Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Report and Recommendation. The Court REVERSES and REMANDS the decision of the Commissioner. On remand, the ALJ is instructed to re-evaluate Plaintiff's claim in light of Dr. Archde acon's treatment record. While the Commissioner is considering the new and material evidence on remand, this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. However, this Court retains jurisdiction over this action such that should Plaintiff be dissatisfied with the new decision of the Commissioner on remand, Plaintiff may petition the Court for entry of an Order reinstating the case on the active docket for judicial review of the new decision. Plaintiff must file said petition within 30 days of the da te of the Commissioners new decision. Should both sides be satisfied with the Commissioners new decision following remand, the prevailing party shall, within 30 days of the Commissioners decision, petition the Court for entry of a final Order adopting and ratifying the new decision. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 8/24/2011. (km1)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 24, 2011

Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Report and Recommendation. The Court REVERSES and REMANDS the decision of the Commissioner. On remand, the ALJ is instructed to re-evaluate Plaintiff's claim in light of Dr. Archde acon's treatment record. While the Commissioner is considering the new and material evidence on remand, this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. However, this Court retains jurisdiction over this action such that should Plaintiff be dissatisfied with the new decision of the Commissioner on remand, Plaintiff may petition the Court for entry of an Order reinstating the case on the active docket for judicial review of the new decision. Plaintiff must file said petition within 30 days of the da te of the Commissioners new decision. Should both sides be satisfied with the Commissioners new decision following remand, the prevailing party shall, within 30 days of the Commissioners decision, petition the Court for entry of a final Order adopting and ratifying the new decision. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 8/24/2011. (km1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farler v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jada Farler
Represented By:	John J McCracken
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?