Martin v. Scripps Howard et al
| Howard E. Martin, III,r |
| William Fee, Michael J. Pretot, Joseph Martinelli, Daniel Tackett and Scripps Howard |
| 1:2010cv00680 |
| September 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Herman J Weber |
| J Gregory Wehrman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed (certified mail) upon Howard E. Martin, III as to #2 Order, #4 Order and #5 Clerk's Judgment. (mtw1) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT affirming #4 Order. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (sct1) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. The Court certifies that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/6/10. (sct1)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Howard E. Martin, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sct1) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/6/10. (sct1)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Howard E. Martin, III. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mtw1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
