COLBERT v. METRO
||November 29, 2010
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||XX US, Outside State
||Susan J. Dlott
||Karen L. Litkovitz
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 11, 2011
ORDER re 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that an appeal of this Order will not be taken in good faith, therefore, DENYING plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 1/11/11.(mtw1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/11/2011: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (mtw1).
|December 3, 2010
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the 1 Complaint filed by Antonio Colbert be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and that the Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a) that for the for egoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Objections to R&R due by 12/20/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/3/10. (mtw1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2010: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (mtw1).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?