Kaeding v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Mark H. Kaeding
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Case Number: 1:2011cv00121
Filed: February 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 81 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS - It is respectfully recommended that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (ECF No. 80) be DENIED. Petitioner can apply directly to the Sixth Circuit for le ave to appeal in forma pauperis at the same time as he applies for a certificate of appealability. Objections to R&R due by 10/31/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/12/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER 45 Order; 74 Objections are overruled adopting 45 Report and Recommendation; 1 Petition is denied with prejudice without certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/19/16. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 70 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD - Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/14/2014. (kpf1)
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO EXPAND THERECORD - Petitioner's request to expand the record by obtaining a transcript of the grand jury proceedings should be DENIED on the merits unless found to be moot. Objections to R&R due by 12/9/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/21/2013. (kpf1)
November 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER TO RE-FILE MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD - Petitioner is ordered to re-send a complete copy of the Motion to Expand showing the September 30, 2013, time stamp to the Clerk who shall scan and file it forthwith.The Motion as now filed (Doc. No. 64) is denied without prejudice to consideration of the Motion if Petitioner re-sends a copy as ordered herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/12/2013. (kpf1)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON REQUEST TO FILE OBJECTIONS - Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. No. 61) should be denied. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/18/2013. (kpf1)
September 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 CLERK'S JUDGMENT filed concurrently with 56 Order signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/30/13. (ba1)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM REGARDING RECUSAL PORTION OF MOTION TO STRIKE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate Judge offers no comment on the request to strike the Report. The Magistrate Judge declines to recuse himself from further participation in this case as a judicial officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/05/2012. (gh1)
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND FOR RE-TRANSFER OF THE CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/21/2012. (kpf1)
September 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER STRIKING "TRAVERSE" - Petitioner's filing, on September 18, 2012, of a "Traverse to Return of Writ" (Doc. No. 46), is STRICKEN. Petitioner may incorporate any arguments he believes have not been addressed in his objections to the Report and Recommendations, which must be filed by September 28, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/19/2012. (kpf1)
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 45 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE MERITS: It is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not d isagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would not be taken in objective good faith. (Objections to R&R due by 9/28/2012). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/11/12. (cib1)
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER TO SEAL - To protect the identity of the minor victim in this matter, various documents on the docket are ordered sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/10/2012. (kpf1)
July 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 NOTICE TO PETITIONER - Petitioner's reply is to be filed not later than August 2, 2012, allowing the extra three days after service by mail which is provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/30/2012. (kpf1)
July 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER' S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 33 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/11/2012. (sc1)
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 TRANSFER ORDER. With the consent of both of them, the reference in the above-captioned case is hereby transferred from The Honorable Karen L. Litkovitz to The Honorable Michael R. Merz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/11/2012. (mdf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaeding v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark H. Kaeding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Represented By: Gene D Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?