Fleming v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Fleming v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Fleming v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	James M. Fleming
Respondent:	Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2011cv00244
Filed:	April 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 7, 2012	Filing 19 JUDGMENT affirming 18 ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 2/7/12. (eh1)
December 28, 2011	Filing 16 RDECISION AND ORDER ON NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Because any appeal would be objectively frivolous, the Court should certify that conclusion to the Court of Appeals, thereby denying Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/17/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/28/11. (pb1)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 7, 2012

Filing 19 JUDGMENT affirming 18 ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 2/7/12. (eh1)

December 28, 2011

Filing 16 RDECISION AND ORDER ON NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Because any appeal would be objectively frivolous, the Court should certify that conclusion to the Court of Appeals, thereby denying Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/17/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/28/11. (pb1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fleming v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James M. Fleming
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?