Nickelson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Le Shawn Nickelson |
| Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 1:2011cv00334 |
| May 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| LAWRENCE |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| S Arthur Spiegel |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 37 Report and Recommendation in its entirety, denying 38 Petitioner's Objections to Report and Recommendation, denying 33 Petitioners Motion for Summary Judgment. Petitioner's habeas corpus petition is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, the Court FINDS that a certificate of appealability should not issue with respect to the claims alleged in the petition and CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that with respect to any application by Petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore the Court DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Finally, the Court's ruling herein r enders the remainder of Petitioners outstanding motions moot, and they are each DENIED as such 53 59 61 62 63 65 70 72 76 and 77 . Pursuant to the Court's authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to refuse for filing any further documents by Petitioner except for a notice of appeal from this Order and to return to Petitioner, without filing, any such documents presented. Unless directed to the contrary by the Court of Appeals, this Court will entertain no further filings by Petitioner in this matter as this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 2/29/2012. (km1)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 74 Motion to Hold Defendant's Counsel in Contempt. The Application for an order to show cause is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 02/24/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
69
DECISION AND ORDER Re: 67 MOTION for Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts Federal Rule 201 and 68 MOTION Pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure R 52 Finding of Facts and Conclusion of Law on the Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(5) filed by Le Shawn Nickelson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/17/12. (cib1) Modified on 2/21/2012 to correct the signature date of the Decision and Order(cib1).
|
|
Filing
58
DECISION AND ORDER denying 56 Motion to Take Judicial NoticeMotion to Take Judicial Notice; denying 57 Motion to Take Judicial Notice Motion to Take Judicial Notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 02/01/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
51
DECISION AND ORDER denying 46 Motion for Handwriting Sample; Petitioners Motion for an Extension of Time to file objections to the Orders at Doc. Nos. 34, 35, 36, and Order Doc. 40 (Doc. No. 47 ) is granted and his time extended to and including February 10, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 01/25/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
36
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING 28 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/17/11. (cib1)
|
|
Filing
32
DECISION AND ORDER denying 5 Motion for Leave to File Letter of Appointment of Counsel; denying 6 Motion for Leave to File Interrogatories and Motion and for Waive Electronic Copy; denying 7 Motion Civil Rule 33 Interrogatories;Granting in part 8 Motion to Waive Electronic Copy of Civil Rule 33 Interrogatories Questions; Denying 9 Motion for Leave to File Civil Rule 36 Requests for Admissions; Granting in part 10 Motion for Leave to File Waive Electronic Copy of Civil Rule Admissions ; Denying 11 Motion for Civil Rule 36 Requests for Admissions; Denying 14 Motion for Leave to File Civil Rule 37; Denying 16 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Respondent's Motion in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Civ. R. 37; Denying 17 Motion to Reply Why Leave Should be Granted; Denying 18 Motion Failure to make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Granting 20 Motion for Leave to File Summary Judgment; Denying 21 Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery or Discovery Second Request. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/13/2011. (kje1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nickelson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Le Shawn Nickelson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
