Clements v. Warden London Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Clements v. Warden London Correctional Institution

Clements v. Warden London Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Bill David Clements
Respondent:	Warden London Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2011cv00442
Filed:	July 1, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	Sandra S Beckwith
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 18, 2012	Filing 11 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 10 ; denying petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. A certificate of appealability will not issue. Petitioner is denied leave to appeal IFP. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 6/18/12. (mb)
May 25, 2012	Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bill David Clements. Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists woul d not disagree with this conclusion. Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and this Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 05/25/2012. (kf)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 18, 2012

Filing 11 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 10 ; denying petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. A certificate of appealability will not issue. Petitioner is denied leave to appeal IFP. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 6/18/12. (mb)

May 25, 2012

Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bill David Clements. Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists woul d not disagree with this conclusion. Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and this Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 05/25/2012. (kf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clements v. Warden London Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden London Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Bill David Clements
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?