Rose v. Ohio et al
Petitioner: Kenneth Rose
Respondent: State of Ohio and Mike Dewine
Case Number: 1:2011cv00700
Filed: October 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the Report in light of the Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice, that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability, and that the Court certify an appeal would not be taken in objective good faith. Objections to R&R due by 10/29/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/12/2012. (kpf1)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 DECISION AD ORDER denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel on the same basis on which the Court previously denied appointment of counsel 16 ; denying 24 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 25 Motion to Expand the Record; denying 26 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/5/2012. (gh1)
July 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kenneth Rose - It is respectfully recommended that the Petitionherein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, it is also recommended that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability and this Court certify that any appeal would not be taken in objective good faith and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/6/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 07/20/12. (pb1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose v. Ohio et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Ohio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mike Dewine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?