Whitten et al v. Fenner Dunlop Conveyor Systems and Services, Inc.
| Robert Whitten and Daryl Spencer |
| Fenner Dunlop Conveyor Systems and Services, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00889 |
| December 19, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| CLINTON |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 40 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation 52 . Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 9/10/13. (mb)
|
|
Filing
52
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint filed by Robert Whitten, Daryl Spencer, 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Fenner Dunlop Conveyor Systems and Services, Inc.: that defendant Fennor's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40) be GRANTED and this case TERMINATED on the active docket. Objections to R&R due by 8/12/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 7/26/13. (jl1)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER finding as moot 20 Motion to Strike ; granting 22 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 9/12/12. (jl1)
|
|
Filing
11
TRIAL PROCEDURAL ORDER: Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 2/14/2012. (eb)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for March 9, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel to file Joint Litigation Plan by February 24, 2012. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 1/5/2012. (eb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
