International Paper Company v. Goldschmidt

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District International Paper Company v. Goldschmidt

International Paper Company v. Goldschmidt

Plaintiff:	International Paper Company
Defendant:	David D. Goldschmidt
Case Number:	1:2011cv00910
Filed:	December 23, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	CLERMONT
Presiding Judge:	Susan J. Dlott
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 26, 2013	Filing 37 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been notified that this case settled before the Magistrate Judge on March 25, 2013; it is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good c ause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/26/2013. (mr1)
May 25, 2012	Filing 25 DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE; (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE; AND (4) GRANTING IN PARTAND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (DOC. 13 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/25/12. (mr1)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 26, 2013

Filing 37 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been notified that this case settled before the Magistrate Judge on March 25, 2013; it is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good c ause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/26/2013. (mr1)

May 25, 2012

Filing 25 DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE; (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE; AND (4) GRANTING IN PARTAND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (DOC. 13 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/25/12. (mr1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: International Paper Company v. Goldschmidt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: International Paper Company
Represented By:	Conrad S Kee
Represented By:	Scott A Carroll
Represented By:	David Kirsten Montgomery
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David D. Goldschmidt
Represented By:	Robert Joseph Parker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?