Bonner v. Scope Services Incorporated et al
Kareem Abdul Bonner |
Scope Services Incorporated, Utility Outsource Services and Duke Energy |
1:2012cv00032 |
January 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
HAMILTON |
Stephanie K. Bowman |
Susan J. Dlott |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; case shall proceed on claims for race discrimination. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 7/21/15. (ba) |
Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 5 Motion Dismiss by Duke Energy; denying as moot 8 and 12 Motions by Snope Services and Utility Outsource Services; the referral shall be removed and the Magistrate Judge will be used for r eferral purposes; a Rule 26(f) Report is due by 7/25/2012; a Scheduling Conference is set for 8/1/2012 at 01:30 PM by teleconference before Judge Michael R. Barrett; parties shall initiate contact with the Court by calling 513-564-7660 five minutes prior to 1:30 pm. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/22/12. (ba1) |
Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: that Duke Energy's unopposed motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) be GRANTED and Duke be dismissed; that the motions of Snope Services and Utility Outsouce be DENIED AS MOOT in light of the filing of plaintiff's first amended complaint. Objections to R&R due by 5/24/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/7/12. (jl1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.