Woods v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. et al
| Joseph M. Woods |
| Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. and FEDEX National LTL, Inc. Long Term Disability Group Benefit Plan |
| 1:2012cv00437 |
| June 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| FAIRFIELD |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been advised by counsel that this case has settled; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 3/20/2013. (mr1)
|
|
Filing
19
AMENDED CALENDAR ORDER: This civil action is before the Court on the parties' joint motion to amend the calendar. (Doc. 17 ). The motion is hereby GRANTED and the Court enters the following Amended Calendar Order: Cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings: 4/15/2013; Memoranda contra: 5/31/2013; Reply memoranda: 6/21/2013. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/20/13. (mr1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
