Smith et al v. Cincinnati City of et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 13, 2015
ORDER denying plaintiff's 61 Motion for TRO; and denying plaintiff's 62 Motion for Permanent Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/13/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|March 6, 2014
ORDER denying plaintiff's 55 second Motion to Injunction to Stay the City. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/6/2014. (art)
|October 4, 2013
ORDER denying plaintiff's 50 Motion for Contempt with Order with grounds, judgment, and injunction; and plaintiff's 51 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/3/2013. (art)
|February 13, 2013
ORDER that plaintiffs' 4 MOTION to Stay is Denied; plaintiffs' 10 MOTION to consolidate is Denied; plaintiffs' 22 MOTION to trial is Denied; plaintiffs' 24 MOTION to Stay is Denied; and plaintiffs' 26 call to action is Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiffs 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment be Denied; defendants Mark Levy, City of Cincinnati, and Constance Gallagher's 11 14 15 MOTIONS to Dismiss be Granted; and plaintiffs' claims against defendants Diane C. Goodwyn, Alesia M. Brown, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office be Dismissed. ( Objections to R&R due by 3/4/2013). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/13/2013. (art)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?