Rarden v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution

Petitioner: Lonnie Rarden
Respondent: Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Case Number: 1:2012cv00660
Filed: August 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: BUTLER
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Barrett
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2015 Filing 24 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re (15) and (19) Report and Recommendations in case 1:12-cv-00660-MRB-MRM; and adopting Report and Recommendations re (9) and (11) Report and Recommendations in case 1:12-cv-00756-MRB-MRM; other than Groun d Four in case 1:12cv756 which is transferred to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to allow Petitioner to request permission to proceed with a second or successive petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) the matter is dismissed with prejudice; case 1:12cv660 is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/22/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
January 28, 2015 Filing 23 ORDER denying (22) Motion to Intervene in case 1:12-cv-00660-MRB-MRM; denying (14) Motion to Intervene in case 1:12-cv-00756-MRB-MRM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 01/28/15. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00660-MRB-MRM, 1:12-cv-00756-MRB-MRM (pb1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 7, 2014 Filing 19 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that Ground Four in Case No. 1:12-cv-756 be transferred to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals so that Rarden can ask that court for permission to proceed. Other than Groun d Four, both Petitions should be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 2/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/7/2014. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00660-MRB-MRM, 1:12-cv-00756-MRB-MRM (kpf1)
December 17, 2013 Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Fourth Ground for Relief in Case No. 1:12-cv-756 be TRANSFERRED to the Sixth Circuit for a determination of whether it may proceed and that the remaining Grounds for Relief be DISMI SSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 1/3/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/17/2013. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00660-MRB-MRM, 1:12-cv-00756-MRB-MRM (kpf1)
October 17, 2012 Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. It is hereby ORDERED that the instant action, Case No. 1:12-cv-756, be consolidated with Case No. 1:12-cv-660. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file all future pleadings, notices and orders in the earli er-filed action, Case No. 1:12-cv-660, and to file a copy of this Order in both Case Nos. 1:12-cv-660 and 1:12-cv-756. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with the Order issued on September 4, 2012 in Case No. 1:12-cv-660 (Doc. 2), respondent s hall include in the return of writ responding to petitioners allegations, both a response to the petition filed in Case No. 1:12-cv-660 and a response to the petition filed in Case No. 1:12-cv-756. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 10/17/12. (lk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rarden v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lonnie Rarden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?