Hiles v. Army Review Board Agency et al
| Marshall G Hiles |
| Army Review Board Agency, Veterans Administration, United States Army, Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs |
| 1:2012cv00673 |
| September 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| PREBLE |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 118 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/8/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
118
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 116 MOTION to Stay this case be Denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 11/7/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 10/19/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
112
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 104 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/12/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER that plaintiff's 99 Motion for Recusal is Denied insofar as plaintiff moves for recusal of the Magistrate Judge. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 99 MOTION for recusal be Denied insofar as plaintiff moves for recusal of the District Judge; defendants' 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment and renewed motion to dismiss be Granted; and plaintiff's 101 MOTION to Vacate the District Court's Order in part be Denied. ( Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/13/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting plaintiff's 90 Motion to extend briefing schedule dates. Parties' briefs on subject matter jurisdiction due on or before 4/30/2015; Parties' opposing briefs due on or before 5/21/2015; Parties' reply briefs due on or before 6/4/2015. Plaintiff's 91 Motion to require defendants to participate in mediation is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/10/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER granting federal defendants' 83 Motion for a briefing schedule. Parties' briefs on subject matter jurisdiction due on or before 3/16/2015; Parties' opposing briefs due on or before 4/10/2015; Parties reply briefs due on or before 4/24/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/26/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying plaintiff's 74 Motion to Strike defendant's affirmative defenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/10/2014. (art) (This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation (doc. 38) as modified. The Report and Recommendation is modified to reflect that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions of the ABCMR. Count I is not dismissed at this time; Defen dants Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 15) is GRANTED as to plaintiffs second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth claims against defendants. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 15) is DENIED with respect to plaintiffs first claim. Plaintiffs Motion to Admi t New Evidence (doc. no. 58) is DENIED. Plaintiffs Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs First claim is RECOMMITTED to the United State Magistrate for further proceedings according to the principles of administrative law. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 9/16/14. (mb)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER and REPORT & RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's 21 MOTION to admit and extend be Granted insofar as plaintiff seeks to submit the documentation attached to the motion 21 and Denied in all other respects. Plaintiff's 22 MOTION to Stay and extend be Denied. Plaintiff's 32 MOTION for Oral Argument, request for hearing, personal appeal is Denied. Plaintiff's 33 MOTION to admit legal evidence and addendum that supports all claims be Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 15 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted; and this case be Dismissed and Terminated on the docket of this Court. ( Objections to R&R due by 4/11/2013). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/25/2013. (art)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; adopting Report and Recommendation 2 . Case is recommitted to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/31/12. (do1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
