Graves v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Graves v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women

Graves v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women

Petitioner:	Denise Graves
Respondent:	Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
Case Number:	1:2012cv00711
Filed:	September 18, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	UNION
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Presiding Judge:	Susan J. Dlott
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 22, 2013	Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: respondents motion to transfer petitioners habeas petition to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (Doc. 23) is GRANTED, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpuse (Doc. 1) is TRANSFERRED pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 1631 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for consideration whether the district court may review the petitionin accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 8/22/2013. (jlw)
June 6, 2013	Filing 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 MOTION for Order to Transfer Petition to Sixth Circuit as a Second Petition filed by Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women: that motion to transfer (Doc. 23) be GRANTED and that petition for writ of habeas corpus be TRANSFERRED to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for consideration whether the district court may review the petition in accordance with 28 USC 2244(b). Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/6/13. (jl1)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 22, 2013

Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: respondents motion to transfer petitioners habeas petition to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (Doc. 23) is GRANTED, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpuse (Doc. 1) is TRANSFERRED pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 1631 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for consideration whether the district court may review the petitionin accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 8/22/2013. (jlw)

June 6, 2013

Filing 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 MOTION for Order to Transfer Petition to Sixth Circuit as a Second Petition filed by Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women: that motion to transfer (Doc. 23) be GRANTED and that petition for writ of habeas corpus be TRANSFERRED to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for consideration whether the district court may review the petition in accordance with 28 USC 2244(b). Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 6/6/13. (jl1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graves v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Denise Graves
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?