Levingston v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Marty Levingston
Respondent: Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Case Number: 1:2012cv00724
Filed: September 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K. Bowman
Presiding Judge: S Arthur Spiegel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting 46 Respondents' motion to reconsider the portion of the Court's Order granting a blanket certificate of appealability on all fourteen grounds; The certificate of appealability granted by the Court in its previous Order adopting the supplemental report and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge 43 is RESCINDED; A certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to grounds 11 and 12 of petitioner's [2 9] amended petition for writ of habeas corpus ; A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to grounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, and 14 of petitioner's 29 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus ; Petitioner's pending motion for extension of time 48 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/31/17. (sct)
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 41 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/6/2017. (mr)
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 41 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because Petitioner has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should b e denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 1/7/2016. (kpf)
November 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - ConclusionBased on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Amended Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be den ied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marty Levingston, 29 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marty Levingston Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/6/2015. (srb)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER declining to adopt 14 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting 7 Petitioner's Motion to Stay. Petitioner's petition to be held in abeyance to await the outcome of Petitioner's efforts in state court. The parties will be free to renew their arguments after such time. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 9/30/2014. (km1)
August 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 MOTION to Stay Habeas Corpus Proceedings Pending Exhaustion of Ineffective Post-Conviction Counsel and Corresponding Constitutional Claims filed by Marty Levingston: that motion be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/2/13. (jl1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Levingston v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marty Levingston
Represented By: Paul Montague Laufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Represented By: Mary Anne Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?