United States of America et al v. Evercare Hospice, Inc. et al
| United States of America, Sara Curtis-Hicks, Leah Broderick and Debbie Turner |
| Evercare Hospice, Inc., Collaborative Care Holdings, LLC, Optum Health Holdings, LLC, Optum, Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated |
| 1:2012cv00887 |
| November 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| WARREN |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND STAY REMAINING CLAIMS PENDING ARBITRATION (Doc. 52 ); AND (2) STAYING THIS CASE PENDING ARBITRATION. The parties shall notify the Court promptly upon conclusion of the arbitration with respect to how they intend to proceed. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/23/2015. (mr)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING THE UNITED STATES' MOTION TO DISMISS THE RELATORS ELIGIBILITY ALLEGATIONS (Doc. 21 ). Relators' remaining allegations, regarding "continuous care," inadequate services and retaliation, for which the government declined to intervene, remain before the Court in this case. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/3/2015. (mr1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
