Compton v. Donley
| Angela Compton |
| Michael B. Donley |
| 1:2012cv00954 |
| December 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| WARREN |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice provided that any party may upon good cause shown within (60) days from the date of this Order reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The Court retains jurisdiction over the settlement contract for the purpose of its enforcement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/20/2013. (art)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER referring this matter to Magistrate Judge Michal J. Newman, for purposes of conducting a settlement conference. Parties are directed to contact Magistrate Newman's chambers (937) 512-1640 no later than 12/31/2013 to arrange a future date for the settlement conference to be held. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/3/2013. (art)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting plaintiff's 29 Motion to Compel Discovery; granting plaintiff's 30 Motion to Substitute Party. The Clerk of Court is hereby Directed to substitute Eric K. Fanning, Acting Secretary of the Air Force as the defendant in this matter. Secretary's 35 MOTION to Strike plaintiff's motion to compel is Denied. The Secretary is Ordered to tender any and all documents described in the Standing Order and as identified by plaintiff on or before 10/2/2013. The Se cretary is further ordered to provide a detailed response addressing the Court's questions raised on page 9 of this Order by 10/2/2013. Depositions on the merits shall be stayed until the Secretary complies with this Order. Eric K Fanning added. Michael B. Donley (Secretary of the Air Force) terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/18/2013. (art)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER SETTING PRE-MEDIATION TELEPHONE CONFERENCE. The above-captioned action is hereby set for a pre-mediation telephone conference on Tuesday, August 20, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 6/14/13. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
23
STANDING ORDER regarding Initial Discovery Protocols purusant to 22 Order on Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/21/2013. (art)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that parties need not exchange Rule 26 disclosures until the Court has ruled on the pending 15 MOTION for Discovery To Adopt Initial Discovery Protocols filed by Angela Compton. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/7/2013. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Compton v. Donley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angela Compton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael B. Donley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
