Belcher v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility et al
| Larry Belcher |
| Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, M Brown and J. Ridout |
| 1:2012cv00985 |
| December 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 25 ; denying as moot [13 & 23] Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; striking the complaint and dismissing the case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 10/29/13. (mb)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 3 Complaint be Stricken pursuant to FRCP 11, and this case be Dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. Defendant's 13 MOTION to Dismiss the complaint on the ground it is deficient, and defendant's 23 MOTION to Dismiss the lawsuit for lack of prosecution be Denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 10/3/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 9/16/2013. (art)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 5 . Complaint against Facility Warden Donald Morgan is Dismissed for failure to state a claim. Application for Default Judgment is Denied. This case is recommitted to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 2/25/13. (do1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
