Back v. Commissioner of Social Security
Frederick G. Back |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2012cv00988 |
December 31, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
BUTLER |
Susan J. Dlott |
Karen L. Litkovitz |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: plaintiffs §406(b) motion for attorney fees 20 is GRANTED.Counsel is AWARDED $12,114.00 in fees. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/18/2015. (jlw1) |
Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 20 MOTION for Attorney Fees be Granted and that counsel be Awarded $12,114.00 in fees. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/25/2015. (art) |
Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 Report and Recommendations re 16 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Frederick G. Back The Equal Access to Justice Act fee petition is GRANTED. The plaintiff isawarded $4,860.00 in attorney fees and $368.00 in costs. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/20/2014. (jlw1) |
Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the EAJA fee petition 16 MOTION for Attorney Fees be Granted and that plaintiff be Awarded $4,860.00 in attorney fees and $368.00 in costs. Objections to R&R due by 5/23/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/6/2014. (art) |
Filing 17 ORDER regarding provisional determination regarding recusal under 28 USC 455. In the event any party disagrees, such party shall within (20) days of the date of this Order, file a motion to such effect. Re 16 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Frederick G. Back. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/11/2014. (art) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 13); the decision of the Commissiner is Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC Sec 405(g). (vp) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the decision of the Commissioner be Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC 405(g). Objections to R&R due by 2/21/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/3/2014. (art) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER pursuant to Magistrate Judges' General Order concerning social security appeals. Plaintiff's statement of errors due by 4/25/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/12/2013. (art) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Back v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frederick G. Back | |
Represented By: | James Roy Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | John J. Stark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.