McCoy v. Cintas, Inc.

Plaintiff: Veronica McCoy
Defendant: Cintas, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00134
Filed: February 25, 2013
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: CLERMONT
Referring Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Presiding Judge: S Arthur Spiegel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 11, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 2 Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration. The Court STAYS the proceedings before this Court pending arbitration. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 6/11/2013. (km1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Cintas, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Veronica McCoy
Represented By: F. Bruce Abel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cintas, Inc.
Represented By: Mark J Chumley
Represented By: Jennifer Walwyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?