Durham v. Chief Bureau of Classification and Reception et al
| Roy A. Durham, Jr. |
| Chief Bureau of Classification and Reception, Warden Warren Correctional Institution, Case Manager Johnson, Rudolph Pringles, Lieutenant Little, Officer Keesler, Officer Reese and Rodney McIntosh |
| 1:2013cv00226 |
| April 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| WARREN |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Herman J. Weber |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
ORDER denying plaintiff's 188 Motion to Stay; denying 188 Motion for Discovery; denying 188 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/22/2019. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER Denying plaintiff's pretrial motions for stay of proceedings and for extensions of time - Docs. 182 174 181 180 175 183 . Plaintiff's response to defendants' 178 MOTION for Summary Judgment due by 1/31/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 1/3/2019. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER denying plaintiff's 169 Motion to Stay proceedings. This matter shall proceed as follows: 11/6/2018 dispositive motion deadline; 3/2019 Final pretrial conference tentatively set before Judge Timothy S. Black; 4/2019 Jury trial tentativ ely set before Judge Timothy S. Black. The specific dates for the final pretrial conference and trial wil be set by the district judge at a later date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/6/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 142 & 150 Motions to compel. To the extend the above granted discovery has not already been provided to plaintiff, defendants are Ordered to produce the request documents within (20) days of the date of this Order. It is further ordered that defendants file a notice of compliance with the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/21/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER that plaintiff respond to defendants' 159 Notice within (30) days of the date of this ORder and address any remaining discovery deficiencies in this matter. Plaintiff's response to defendants due by 4/1/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/1/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
154
AMENDED DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 137); (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS (Docs. 138, 139); AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 121). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/02/18. (jlm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER ADOPTING 137 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 137 Report and Recommendations; Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. 138, 139) are OVERRULED; Plaintiff's second motion for leave of court to file a third amended compla int (Doc. 121) is DENIED; This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/31/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER granting plaintiff's 115 motion to stay is Granted, and the Court has considered the new information plaintiff has asserted in his motion for leave to supplement his motion to stay. For good cause shown, defendants' 112 and [114 ] motions for extension of time are Granted and plaintiff's 113 motion is Granted to the extent it seeks an extension of time. The deadline for the parties to file their supplemental briefs concerning the impact of Surles on the exhaustion is sues in this case is extended to 1/10/2017. To the extent that plaintiff seeks a stay of proceedings of at least three months, plaintiff has filed to present any evidence to support his allegations that he cannot safely access legal materials due to an "ongoing campaign" by other inmates "to taunt, harass, and physically attack him." Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to stay proceedings is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 12/6/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
102
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 93 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/30/15. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER that plaintiff's 91 Motion to Stay is Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' 65 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings be Granted. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. (Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/2/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 79 Motion to prevent dismissal. The parties are Ordered to submit supplemental briefs in accordance with this opinion within (30) days of the entry of this Order. Parties supplmental brief is due by 6/14/20 15. Plaintiff's 82 supplemental complaint is Striken form the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/12/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 77 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/11/2015. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER ADOPTING 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/31/14. Plaintiff's 74 Objections are OVERRULLED; Plaintiff's 68 Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint is DENIED; and the unserved DEFEND ANTS named in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to effect service of process. (eh1)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying 48 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendation 54 denying plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss certain defendants; denying motions to amend complaint and to stay case. This case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 6/20/14. (mb)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER that plaintiff's 39 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss defendants Romanak, Bush, Maggard, Sarwar, and McIntosh, and 50 , 51 MOTIONS to amend his complaint and stay the proceedings are Denied. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' ; 48 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings be Denied. Plaintiff shall have (30) days from the date of this Order to submit a sufficient number of copies of his second amended complaint and summons forms for service on those defendants named in this Order who have not been served. ( Objections to R&R due by 6/2/2014). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/14/2014. (art)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 35 . The second amended complaint is dismissed. This case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 1/8/14. (mb)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's 4 , 5 and 6 Motions for Extension of Time to file a response to the Deficiency Order issued 4/15/2013. Plaintiff's 17 Motion to disregard his motion for voluntary dismissal of the complaint is Grant ed. Therefore, plaintiff's 16 Motion for voluntary dismissal of the complaint is Denied as moot. Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Extension of Time to file an amended complaint is Granted. Plaintiff is directed to file a second amended com plaint, which must not exceed 20 pages in lenght within (21) days of the date of filing of this Order. Plaintiff is hereby notified that if he fails to comply with this Order, the action may be dismissed for failure to comply with FRCP 8. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/19/2013. (art)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
