Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: David C. Howard
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2013cv00295
Filed: May 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: WARREN
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Litkovitz
Presiding Judge: S Arthur Spiegel
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER granting plaintiff (30) days to file a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to FRCP 60. Plaintiff's due date set for 5/2/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/2/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 NOTATION ORDER granting plaintiff's 42 Request to have Clerk forward document 36 - 39 to plaintiff's address of record. (Clerk issued this date Docs. 36-39 to plaintiff's address of record). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 3/12/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 3/12/2018 (art).
January 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 35 ); AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE FROM THE DOCKET OF THE COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/14/2015. (mr1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting defendant's 31 Motion to Stay discovery. Discovery is Stayed in this matter pending resolution of defendant's 33 motion for voluntary remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/5/2014. (art)
May 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that defendant Commissioner is Ordered to serve the Declaration of Patrick J. Herbst and attached exhibits 22 on plaintiff and show proof of service within (10) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall have (21) days from the date of service of the Declaration of Patrick J. Herbst and attached exhibits to submit a supplemental response to the Commissioner's 18 motion to dismiss, addressing any issued raised in the declaration and attached documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/12/2014. (art)
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying plaintiff's 7 Motion to comply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/26/2013. (art)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David C. Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?