NorCal Tea Party Patriots v. Internal Revenue Service et al
| NorCal Tea Party Patriots |
| Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury and John Doe |
| 1:2013cv00341 |
| May 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Susan J. Dlott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
455
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 340 Plaintiffs Americans Against Oppressive Laws, Inc., NorCal Tea Party Patriots, San Angelo Tea Party, South Dakota Citizens for Liberty, Inc., Texas Patriots Tea Partys Motion to Unseal Court Filing s and Open the May 19, 2017 Hearing to the Public; granting in part and denying in part 386 Interested Party the Cincinnati Enquirer's Motion to Unseal; granting in part and denying in part 392 Defendants Lois Lerner and Holly Paz's Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 393 The Cincinnati Enquirer's Expedited Motion to Unseal Documents 331, 332, 333, 334, and 344; Defendants Lois Lerner and Holly Paz shall file copies of the briefing on their Motion for Pr otective Order with redactions to the sensitive and personal information included in those briefs, including references to their supporting declarations and exhibits documenting the harassment and death threats they and their families have faced with in ninety (90) days of entry of this Order; Defendants Lois Lerner and Holly Paz shall file copies of the following documents with redactions to the names of their family members or personal friends, any home addresses or any other personal identifie rs within ninety (90) days of entry of this Order: (1) Holly Paz Merits Deposition, Exhibit 43 in 355 Support of United States' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 355-17); (2) Lois Lerner Merits Deposition, Exhibit 44 in Support of 355 United States' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 355-18); and (3) 357 United States' Statement of Proposed Undisputed Material Facts In Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment on Class Action Claim; Plaintiffs are permitted to file a redacte d version of 375 Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment; a redacted version of Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts and Response to IRS's Statement of Proposed Undisputed Facts (Doc. 375-1); and a reda cted version of Holly Paz Class Certification Deposition, Exhibit 54 in Opposition to United States Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 375-7) which exclude references to the names of Lerner and Paz's family members or personal friends, any home a ddresses, or any other personal identifiers; and Plaintiffs are permitted to file an unsealed version of Exhibit 104 to Plaintiffs' Opposition to United States' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 375-5). Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 5/3/2022. (kkz)
|
|
Filing
435
ORDER granting 419 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 8/17/2018. (mr)
|
|
Filing
228
REDACTED ORDER granting plaintiffs' motion for class certification. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER regarding 185 Motion to Stay. The Court will extend the stay for a period of seven days from the date of this Order to enable the Government to file a petition for mandamus with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. However, the stay will be automatically extended for an additional sixty days if the Government timely files the petition for mandamus within seven days. The Government may move the Court for further extension of the stay for good cause. Additionally, the stay will be automatically dissolved within seven days of the resolution of the appellate proceeding.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER denying 141 Government's Motion for Protective Order; granting 142 Motion to Compel. The Court orders the Government to respond to requests for production 56, 63, and 64. The Court further orders the Government to authenticate, or respond that it is unable to authenticate, the so-called USA Today document referenced as Exhibit B in CM/ECF Doc. 142.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER that the Management Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 77) is GRANTED, the Line-Level Employee Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 78) is GRANTED, and the Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendant Carter Hull (Doc. 79) is GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss Claims against the Federal Defendants (Doc. 73) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Count One against Federal Defendants is dismissed, but Counts Two and Three against the Federal Defendants are not dismissed. Finally, Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery Related to Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 83) is DENIED AS MOOT.. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott. (wam1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
