Yarbrough v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
| Chauncey Yarbrough |
| Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution |
| 1:2013cv00443 |
| June 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 27 Report and Recommendations denying 24 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 12/6/16. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR LEAVETO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (ECF No. 24) should be denied. Objections to R&R due by 12/1/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/11/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge's 10/8/2015 R&R (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED. It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Motion for the Relief from Judgment (Doc. 18 ) is DENIED; and 2. This matter shall remain CLOSED and TERMINATED from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/15/2016. (jee)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - It is respectfully recommended that Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 18) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 10/26/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/8/2015. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/21/2014. (kpf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yarbrough v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Chauncey Yarbrough | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution | |
| Represented By: | Hilda Rosenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
